I’m mad gay doe lol
We’re my life in college honey
Yass I lived for them!
I wish I could express how thankful i am! I love you all(:
TRANS RAPPER MYKKI BLANCO FREESTYLES IN HARLEM
This is a must see. As one of the best gay rappers in the game (and soon to be...
I’m seriously crying I love every last one of you to death.
I began writing this series at the end of last summer and finished it in October—upon seeing the last movie, I decided to reread the entire book series. I’ve always been pretty critical of the series, especially as I got older and it seemed like a perfect opportunity to write about all the things that irk me about the series. From small plot holes to infuriating character developments and events, I go all out on the series. Now, of course, this comes from a place of love but it’s a very harsh love and I don’t recommend you read this if you’re the type how can’t handle pretty rough criticism of the series/JKR/certain characters. Also, spoilers abound—this was written for an audience that has a more-than-cursory familiarity with the books (and this is strictly book-verse, no movie-verse stuff).
So, without further rambling, here’s the first part (which is much shorter than the rest and not as detailed) of Things That Confuse and Anger Me About the Harry Potter Series: Philosopher’s Stone:
1. How could the Dursleys get away with that level of abuse? After Harry accidentally sets the Brazilian snake free, he gets his “longest ever punishment”—a month in his cupboard. Maybe I’m reading it too literally, but it makes it seem like he’s not allowed out for ANYTHING, even school; he has to sneak food in the middle of the night and by the time he’s allowed out, summer has started. No school officials noticed that this thin, scraggly, obviously abused young child is missing for the entire last month of school?
2. When Harry asks about Wizard banks, Hagrid replies that there’s “just the one—Gringotts”. Really, Hagrid? So, magical folk from Egypt, Africa, America or ANYWHERE else have to Apparate all the way to London to take money out of the bank? It’s little things like these that make me feel like J. K. Rowling loses grip on the absolute breadth of the world she’s created; she’s from Britain so it makes sense for things to be concentrated in Britain (and Scotland, where Hogwarts is). But even as the series progresses and the world expands and we’re even introduced to foreign witches and wizards we’re still lead to believe that the core of the entire magical community is Britain, specifically London, and Hogwarts. Is there really just ONE magical government, and one person is the leader of an entire world of people? And that person is Cornelius Fudge? (In book four, some of these issues with the government are, thankfully, addressed.)
3. When the little First Years are gathered outside the Great Hall, Harry and Ron are wondering about what kind of test they’ll have to pass to be sorted into their houses. Really, Ron? It’s unbelievable that this kid who has had five siblings andboth parents go to Hogwarts before him has no idea about the Sorting Hat. And even if he didn’t, some other first years from Wizarding homes would know about it and would be talking about it with their peers. I get that it’s a device to create suspension for the readers but…come on.
4. This is something that’s always bothered me ever since I was a kid. When Harry and Ron save Hermione from the troll and she lies to McGonagall, saying that she went searching for the troll. What the hell, Hermione? Why not just tell the truth: you were in the bathroom, didn’t know about the troll and Harry and Ron helped you? Either way, Harry and Ron look like the saviors but in the lie she tells, it makes her look like a glory-seeking fool. I’ve never understood this lie and I don’t think it was necessary for Harry, Ron and Hermione to become friends.
5. This is a recurring theme in this book: Harry being unjustly rewarded and favored. The first major example is when Harry chases Malfoy down on his broomstick; McGonagall catches him and at first we’re led to believe she’s going to punish him (because she’s McGonagall and she doesn’t play favorites and she’s very straight-lace) but instead she rewards him with a spot on the Gryffindor Quidditch team and a high-end, expensive broomstick (even though the rule is that first years aren’t allowed their own brooms). The second is a less egregious example: when Harry has spent the past three nights roaming the halls after hours to sit in front of the Mirror of Erised. This one is a little more understandable; Dumbledore finds him and reprimands him in his kind, old-man way, teaching him a valuable lesson about dwelling on dreams. So, it’s not quite as bad but the first example in the series of Dumbledore’s obvious favoritism towards Harry. But then, the doozy of all favoritism doozies, perhaps in the entire series: the end-of-year feast in the Great Hall. Due to points lost for Harry and Hermione getting caught getting rid of Norbert the dragon, Gryffindor is in last place for the House Cup and Slytherin has won for the seventh year running. However, Dumbledore unloads a boat-load of last minute points on Gryffindor house for Harry, Ron and Hermione’s actions while going after the Philosopher’s Stone. He gives the three of them just enough points to be neck-in-neck with Slytherin and then awards Neville an extra 10 points for his courage, which pushes them ahead and then win the House Cup. All the green and silver decorations instantly turn to red and gold and the rest of the school celebrates Slytherin unexpected and humiliating loss.
What the fuck, Dumbledore?
This is a huge problem in the entire series, which I’ll probably touch a lot: it’s completely confusing in its sense of morality and right and wrong. The whole series is supposed to be about good vs. evil but save for a few complex characters (Snape, Dumbledore, the Malfoys), we’re stuck with this version of black and white morality. And in this instance, the headmaster of the entire school—who is supposed to care for all his students and foster inter-house civility and camaraderie—is basically saying to the entire school, “Yeah, fuck Slytherin.” Why couldn’t Gryffindor have come in a triumphant but humble second and then actually won another year, like with the Quidditch Cup? But oh, no, Dumbledore had to restore the points and repair Harry’s damaged reputation within the school. Do you think any of the Slytherin students, especially the ones who have just finished their first year of school and are really excited about having won the House Cup, will ever trust Dumbledore again? Man, I wonder if this could possibly come back to fuck them over, when like, a war starts or something.
So there we have it! If you have some of your own plot-holes, inconsistencies, or things that just irk your soul about the series, or if you take issue with some of the stuff I’ve listed here tell me all about it!
I’ll post the second part sometimes later this week, or you can visit my big blog Pussy Goes Grrr and read the series in its entirety!
In the books, In the movies, In fanfiction.
I hate Romione.
I hate Ronald more than I hate Voldy, Umbridge or Skeeter.
I have nothing against people who love Ronald but… Argh.
submitted.
I don’t think I’ve ever agreed so hard with a confession from this blog. OP, lept me love you down.
This makes me really happy. Can I be best friends with this person?
So, Ron is such a jealous douchebag that their friendship wouldn’t be able to survive her not wanting to be with him? How is that in any way, shape, or form the way a good friend acts? Like…gah, Romione creeps me out to no end.
It wasn’t a matter of either of them choosing each other. It seems like during the whole series, they just wanted to stay away from loving each other, just like Elizabeth and Darcy. They loved beyond love. I truly believe that even if they didn’t meet until they were adults, they would have loved just the same.
graphic submitted.
I hate this idea of not having a choice in love. It’s such a dangerous idea, it really is. It leads to people (real life people, not fictional characters who are vessels for a writer) believe that they should stay in an unhealthy relationship or put up with bullshit because it’s their “soul mate” or some shit like that.
Fuck that. I didn’t fall in love and love didn’t “choose me”. I chose it. I control it. End of story.
Yeah, because when I love someone I totally act like a jealous, whiny little bitch and abandon that person. Hermione begged him to take the locket off and stay. He didn’t. His self-centered feelings of jealousy and being betrayed were more important than anything else—his friends, the war, the mission at hand, everything.
The romanticizing of Ron’s actions is so fucking disturbing to me and I just cannot forgive JKR for telling people, yes, this is how relationships should be, it’s okay for your significant other to treat you this way, this is what true love looks like. That is not love. Jealousy is not love. Abandonment is not love.
Book!Ron was a huge douche and the reason I prefer movie!Ron is because they cut out so much of his douchiness.
Wut? How about no, I don’t like him because I think he’s an overly aggressive, jealous asshole. Not everyone has those qualities. I don’t like him because I know lots of people who say he reminds them of their abusive ex. I don’t like him for a lot of reasons and they’re all valid. No one is denying “what we all are” Sweeping generalizations are sweeping.